Chamber This Week – March 10, 2017

Featuring member news, upcoming events and more, Chamber this Week is your source for information on the GNCC.

Chamber This Week – March 10, 2017

 

 

 

Share this:

Fire & Ice Gala Huge Success

Albert Iannontuono, Wayne Gates, and MP Chris Bittle

OneFoundation Gala in Support of Medical Imaging at Niagara Health System

On Saturday, February 25th, OneFoundation for Niagara Health System’s Annual Gala dazzled supporters of Niagara Health at the alluring Fire and Ice themed event, held at Sheraton on the Falls.

Over 360 guests, from across the region, joined OneFoundation for an enchanting evening overlooking the frozen wonder and beauty of Niagara Falls, in support of Medical Imaging, a service that each and every resident of Niagara will likely use more than once in their lifetime.

Joe Maggiolo & Roger D’Ali

Medical Imaging equipment plays a key role in maintaining and improving patient health. Each year, approximately 362,000 exams, from ultrasounds to X-rays and CT Scans, are performed at the sites of Niagara Health. These exams provide physicians with information about internal structures that they otherwise could not see.

“In order to continue providing the highest quality of care for Niagara Health’s patients, it is absolutely essential that Medical Imaging equipment is kept up-to-date,” explains Dr. Julian Dobranowski, Chief of Medical Imaging at Niagara Health. “Attendees of OneFoundation’s Gala have helped raise funds for the purchase of Ultrasounds and X-Ray units, and upgrades to existing equipment at the sites of Niagara Health, ensuring that patients across Niagara region are able to receive the care they need, when they need it.”

Niagara Health Executives

“The Niagara community has the power to impact the well-being of virtually every Niagara resident through their support of Niagara Health,” explained OneFoundation’s new President and CEO, Roger D. Ali, who was empowered by philanthropic spirit that filled the evening. “Our donors are truly helping build a Healthier Niagara.”

OneFoundation would like to thank everyone who attended the Gala, the numerous sponsors, and those who donated in support of Medical Imaging, for helping support a Healthier Niagara. This support will help provide extraordinary care to the residents of Niagara.

–  30 –

Chief of the NRP

For more information and photos of the evening, please contact:

 

Shelby Riddell
Communications Specialist, OneFoundation for Niagara Health System
Shelby.Riddell@niagarahealth.on.ca
Direct: 905-378-4647 x 32315  |  Cell: 905-246-7596  | Main: 905-323-FUND (3863)

About OneFoundation for Niagara Health System
OneFoundation for Niagara Health System is a non-profit organization that raises funds in support of Niagara Health. OneFoundation offers donors an opportunity to direct their charitable giving in a way that affects the well-being of virtually every Niagara resident by ensuring that care teams at all Niagara Health sites are well-equipped with the tools they need.

OneFoundation, along with its community partners, is committed to playing an active role in supporting a healthier Niagara. For more information, visit www.onefoundationfornhs.com.

OneFoundation Board of Directors

 

Share this:

Electricity in Ontario, Part 1: The System

Soaring electricity costs in Ontario might be the single greatest threat to business in the province. In the first of a three-part series, we examine how the system works, and what has allowed this to happen.


The cost of electricity in Ontario has been increasing at four times the rate of inflation since 2006. Everyone in Ontario has felt the effects. The rate hikes have been particularly punishing for seniors and people on fixed incomes whose bills have risen far above what they can pay, for residents in rural Ontario who are paying far more than their counterparts in cities, but also for businesses, particularly heavy power users, to whom electricity represents a huge portion of their costs. The Ontario Chamber of Commerce’s Empowering Ontario report found that as many as 1 in 20 Ontario businesses believed they would be forced to close due to electricity costs within five years.

Like the provincial debt, this problem has been growing for a long time, and if the present government is guilty of anything, it is that they have perhaps not dealt with it as well as they might have, not that they caused it. In the first post of this series, we’ll examine the current status of electricity pricing and generation in Ontario.

Ernie Eves’ Progressive Conservative government was plagued by spending scandals and allegations of corruption within his party, much like the current Liberal government. The media regularly ran stories about the alleged mismanagement of Ontario’s electricity generation under the governments of both Eves and his predecessor, Mike Harris, and the blackout of 2003 raised questions about the PCs’ ability to keep the lights on at all. Ironically, the issue was actually a major part of the Liberal election campaign against them.

The sale of Hydro One was first proposed when Mike Harris was Premier, and then pursued by Eves, who changed his mind in the face of rising prices and a consumer revolt. The Liberals opposed the sale in 2003, re-evaluated but ultimately rejected it in 2009, and returned to it in 2015.

When Dalton McGuinty was first elected in 2003, the all-in cost of power was 6.5 cents per kWh, including a 0.7 cent debt-retirement charge. Now, after new increases that took effect on May 1, 2016, rates vary from 8.7 cents per kWh for off-peak usage to as much as 18 cents on-peak. This increase has been far in excess of the rate of inflation.

Some of the increase is due to changes in the way we generate power and our shift away from fossil fuels. Climate change is already harming Niagara farmers and viticulturists, and the world is facing the prospect of greater environmental disasters to come. It is probably no exaggeration to say that abandoning power generation from fossil fuels has become an imperative for our entire civilization.

The Ontario government promised to phase out coal-fired power generation in the province completely, and delivered on that in 2014. Ten years ago, a quarter of the province’s power was generated by coal; today, none is. This corresponds into a 17 per cent reduction in GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions, or 34 megatonnes – the single largest GHG reduction measure anywhere in North America.

Thunder Bay Generating Station, Ontario’s last coal-fired power plant. Photo Credit: Derek Hatfield

As a result, the power grid in Ontario is now 90 per cent renewable, and we have become a leader in renewable energy both in Canada and the world. Alberta and Saskatchewan are looking to phase out the fossil fuel plants on which they currently rely (in 2010, Ontario generated 12,285 GWh from coal, while Saskatchewan generated 12,084 and Alberta a staggering 41,013), and they will probably learn from Ontario’s experience when they do it.

After the coal phase-out, the single biggest source of electricity in Ontario is now nuclear. This has necessitated extending the lifespans of old nuclear plants in Ontario, such as Pickering, which was originally commissioned in 1971 and is now the oldest commercial nuclear plant in the country. We’ll go into more detail about them in Part 2.

Gas has become Ontario’s second-greatest source of electricity, currently generating just under 10,000 MW with capacity planned to increase to almost 11,000 MW by 2020. Gas has become a very popular choice for new generating plants across the world and although it is not completely clean, it is dramatically cleaner than coal, so the trend towards gas has noticeably decreased global CO2 levels.

But when I mentioned Ontario gas plants, that probably wasn’t the first thing that you thought of. An explanation of the scandal properly belongs in Part 2 of this series, in which we’ll get into the causes of high power bills.

To assess our prices in Ontario, all we really have to compare with is our previous bills, and compared to them, the increase is huge. The average monthly household bill is $246 in Toronto, $229 in low-density rural Ontario, and $200 in medium-density rural Ontario, based on a consumption of 1,000 kWh per month. These rates are expensive compared to $100 a month in Montreal, $117 in Winnipeg, or $128 in Illinois; comparable to Chicago at $210 or Halifax at $220, and a bargain compared to $383 in Boston, $409 in New York City, or $430 in San Francisco. To keep it in perspective, although Ontario prices have increased enormously, there are still many other jurisdictions in Canada and America that pay far more than we do for power – and the claim that Ontario’s energy costs are the highest in North America is simply false.

There’s a difference between rates and the final electricity bill, and in the former, Ontario costs are also high, but again, not the highest in North America or even close to it. In terms of energy rates, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Illinois, Michigan, California, New York, and Massachusetts all pay considerably more for power than Ontario. New York pays 28.9 cents per kilowatt-hour (¢/kWh) compared to Ontario’s 14.3, Boston pays a similar amount, and even New England rates look like a bargain compared to 41.4 ¢/kWh in Australia or 42.8 in Germany.

But this is not to say that Ontario’s bills aren’t higher and getting higher than they should be. What’s tacked on to Ontario bills to make them so high is the Global Adjustment (GA). For residential and small business customers, the GA is simply rolled into your overall rate, so you are not being shown what percentage of your bill goes into it. The GA covers:

  • regulated rates to Ontario Power Generation nuclear and baseload hydroelectric generating stations
  • contracts with the Ontario Power Authority such as for new gas-fired facilities, renewable facilities, and nuclear refurbishments
  • contracted rates administered by the Ontario Electricity Financial Corporation paid to existing generators
  • the cost of delivering conservation programs in the province and the payments made to participants under contracts with the Ontario Power Authority for demand response programs

On the generation side, 38 per cent of the GA goes to nuclear energy (although nuclear generates 59 per cent of the electricity), 12 per cent to hydro (in exchange for 23 per cent of the electricity), 17 per cent to gas (which generates 7 per cent), 18 per cent to wind (8 per cent generated), and 15 per cent to solar (only 2 per cent generated). Green energy is a smaller portion of the adjustment, but nuclear and hydro power offer more bang-per-buck, and without emissions.

Ontario Clean Air Alliance chair and former Toronto Hydro commissioner Jack Gibbons claimed that the Wynne government was a captive of the nuclear industry, and had made preserving Power Members’ Union jobs a priority over lower power bills for consumers. Without special insight into the inner workings of the Wynne cabinet and the Ministry of Energy, we can’t tell if this allegation is true or not.

The GA now constitutes the bulk of electricity bills in Ontario, making our fairly competitive kWh rate somewhat irrelevant. In 2013, for instance, the average hourly price was about 2.5¢/kWh, and the GA was about 6¢/kWh. In 2015, it had gone up to an average of 8¢/kWh. For every $100 on your electricity bills that year, $77 went to the GA.

The actual fair market rate for power in Ontario, the Hourly Ontario Energy Price or HOEP, is set by the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), which manages Ontario’s electrical system. The IESO is a not-for-profit corporate entity that was established in 1998 by the Electricity Act of Ontario, and is governed by an independent board whose Chair and Directors are appointed by the Government of Ontario. As its name implies, it operates independently of all other actors in the electricity market.

To determine prices, the IESO issues a forecast of the energy it believes will be consumed on that day and up to a month ahead of time including a reserve of 1,400 MW above actual consumption. These forecasts are continually updated when new information becomes available, such as hotter-than-predicted weather (which means a greater demand from air conditioners). The forecast demand is posted online so suppliers can plan their output accordingly. The forecasts are pretty accurate, with actual consumption varying no more than 2 per cent from the forecast. You can see these forecasts and demands yourself in real time on the IESO’s website.

Electricity producers review the forecast and decide how much power they are willing to offer, and at what price. They electronically submit these offers to the IESO. At the same time, a small number of large consumers bid on power, indicating their willingness to buy a certain amount of electricity at a certain price. As with an auction, if the market clearing price rises above their bid price, they decline to buy. Participation in this market is the only way to sell electricity in Ontario.

The IESO then has a figure for the power it needs to supply and a set of offers to sell power. The IESO accepts the lowest bid first, and the proceeds through incrementally higher bids until it has bought enough power to satisfy demand. The price of the last and highest offer the IESO accepts – the offer that puts it over the line to meet forecast demand – is the price paid to all accepted suppliers. The IESO then has to “dispatch,” or send notice of accepted offers. Some additional suppliers are paid “Operating Reserve” payments, which only require them to be “on call” should demand spike for some unforeseen reason. Their generating capacity will not be called upon unless needed. These prices are also determined through the market.

The HOEP is the average of the market clearing prices in the twelve auctions conducted each hour. The HOEP is the rate charged to large consumers and local distribution companies.

For example, at a particular time, let’s say the IESO has forecast that the province will need 1,000 MW (it needs far more – this is a simplified example). Three power generators make offers: Generator A offers 600MW at 10¢/KWh, B offers 400MW at 8¢/KWh, and C offers 200MW at 11¢/KWh. The IESO accepts B’s offer, as the lowest, which gives it 400MW. It then accepts A’s offer as the next-lowest, and the additional 600MW gives it the total of 1000MW it needs. It does not need C’s capacity and C’s price is higher, so it declines that offer. Both A and B are paid 10¢/KWh, since that was the price of the highest accepted offer. 10¢/KWh becomes one of the twelve market clearing prices that will be averaged over the hour to provide the HOEP. Generator D is a hydroelectric station that can quickly adjust its capacity. It isn’t needed right now, but it is paid an Operating Reserve payment for an additional 200MW in case demand spikes and additional capacity is required very quickly.

This, in short, is how electricity prices in Ontario are determined. This process, plus the Global Adjustment, taxes, and whatever miscellaneous fees may be tacked on, becomes your power bill.

The Adam Beck complex. Photo credit: Ontario Power Generation

One thing that often irritates Niagarans is that we have to pay high electricity costs despite living next-door to a major power source in Niagara Falls. There are two stations at the Falls – Ontario Hydro’s Sir Adam Beck facility, with two plants, and the U.S. Robert Moses Hydro Electric Plant, built directly opposite. Both sides are tied into each other’s grids by high-voltage transmission lines.

By international agreement, the Canadian side draws 56,500 cubic feet of water per second, and the Americans draw 32,500. The Adam Beck stations generate up to 2,000 MW. Together with the Robert Moses plant, these power stations supply about a quarter of all power used in New York State and Ontario. In New York State, the Niagara Preference Power Program (NPPP) provides power to 51 municipally and/or cooperatively-owned rural electric providers in New York State.

This gives you an idea of how our electrical system works and how prices in Ontario are determined. In our next post, we will go into how prices came to be so high.

Share this:

Liberals look at making skilled immigrant loans pilot project permanent

Qualified professional newcomers face big cost barrier to securing credentials in Canada

A pilot Conservative project to loan money to help skilled immigrants land jobs in their field could be revived as a permanent program under the Liberal government.

One of the biggest barriers for newly arrived doctors, dentists, engineers and high-tech professionals is coming up with the cash to pay for the required licensing fees, exams and training upgrades.

Proponents say micro loans speed up the process and pay off big time for the federal treasury, yet they can’t keep up with a demand that will likely grow with the Liberal government’s plan to welcome more economic immigrants to the country in 2017.

Jean-Bruno Villeneuve, spokesperson for Patty Hajdu, the minister of employment, workforce development and labour, said a three-year pilot that was launched in 2011 under the Conservatives demonstrated that loans sped up the credential recognition process, led to a 47-per-cent increase in full-time employment and eased reliance on government income assistance.

“We were very pleased with the results of the pilot, and we’re working hard on a framework for a more permanent policy,” he told CBC News.

A spokesperson for Finance Minister Bill Morneau would not say if a new foreign credentials loan program would be included in this year’s budget.

“Can’t tip our hand here either way,” the official said. “Stay tuned.”

The Conservative government earmarked $35 million over five years to make the Foreign Credential Recognition Loans program permanent in the 2015 budget, but it was never implemented due to the election. Then-prime minister Stephen Harper had also promised to more than double that figure during the 2015 campaign by adding an extra $40 million over five years.

Herb Emery, a labour market economist at the University of New Brunswick, said loans to help immigrants overcome the up-front financial hurdle have a big net payoff in federal revenue.

‘Huge’ impact on federal treasury

“When these immigrants are taken out of low-skill jobs and converted into high-paying ones, the impact on the federal treasury is huge,” he said. “They recoup any costs they put into it in the first year alone, and from then on it’s basically pure profit for the treasury.”

Emery said immigrants often have no access to credit or bank loans — what he calls a “pervasive market failure.” That leaves newcomers unemployed or working in low-paid jobs just scraping to get by.

Many skilled immigrants wind up unemployed or working in low-paying jobs because of the financial barrier to earning their foreign recognition credentials. (CBC)

“We’re doing a horrible job in that we bring very high human capital individuals to Canada, then we throw away their potential by not letting them work in what they are trained and educated to do,” he said.

There are several programs in Canada offering micro loans between $5,000 and $15,000, with some receiving operating funding contributions from the federal government and the provinces.

One of the programs Emery has reviewed favourably is the Calgary-based Immigrant Access Fund (IAF), which grants loans to immigrants across the country. Dianne Fehr, vice-president of stakeholder relations, said it needs millions more in federal funding to keep up with a growing demand.

“It’s a very clear way to support immigrants toward labour market integration,” she said.

’Significant barrier’

Fehr said even a few thousand dollars is a “significant barrier” for many immigrants who are unemployed or working at “survival” jobs like fast food restaurants or taxi and ride-booking services.

In a pre-budget submission to the Commons finance committee, she requested a three-year commitment of $24.8 million that includes loan capital investment, operating costs and infrastructure.

Right now, the program is facing a growing demand for loans with decreased operating funds from the federal and Alberta governments.

She pointed to a high success rate, with 75 per cent of recipients completing their learning plan and more than 97 per cent of the loans repaid with modest interest.

One recipient was Egypt-born Omar Eladl of Calgary, who earned $12 an hour as a security guard while working to get his credentials as a pharmacist to meet Canadian standards. He had to squeeze in 1,000 unpaid hours in the field while supporting his family and faced the considerable costs of travel, materials and exam fees.

Real challenges

“All of these were real challenges for me,” he said.

A micro loan of $5,000 helped him speed up the process. When he was able to work as a pharmacist last year, three years after he arrived in Canada, his salary more than tripled.

The federal, provincial and territorial governments have agreed to a framework aimed at improving the fairness, timeliness, transparency and consistency of qualification recognition in Canada. Several federal departments fund various programs and organizations that help with the foreign credential recognition process and resettlement.

Patrick Snider, the director of skills and immigration policy for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said the federal government has taken some good steps to speed up foreign credentials. But he said more must be done, including improved customer service to make the system easier to navigate.

Snider said federal investment should focus on speeding up the process, including loans and expanded work-integrated learning programs.

“Right now Canada is in a unique moment in the last few decades where we are really standing out as a country that’s welcoming to immigrants, and can very much position itself as a country of choice for some very highly skilled people,” he said. “If you look at the impact that highly trained immigrants have had in the past, it can be really transformative to the economy.”


Original article: http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/skilled-immigrants-loans-credentials-1.4002948

Share this:

New Strategic Plan will position NC as Canada’s leader in applied, experiential learning

Niagara College’s Board of Governors has approved a new Strategic Plan that will that point Niagara College toward a bold future as Canada’s leader in applied experiential learning.

Niagara College’s 2017-2021 Strategic Plan forms a road map that will guide the college as it faces a postsecondary landscape marked by significant and rapid change.

The plan envisions a student-focused, inclusive learning community offering a breadth of programs that respond to key sectors of the Niagara region, Ontario and the broader global economy; immersing students in a unique, highly experiential learning environment; producing innovative and entrepreneurial graduates who possess global and cultural competencies; and leveraging the College’s expertise in the pursuit of new sectors and markets at home and around the world.

“Our strategic plan provides bold strategic directions that will guide our initiatives and decisions as we face the challenges and opportunities created by demographic shifts, an increasingly competitive postsecondary sector, and the evolving needs of learners and employers alike,” said Niagara College president Dan Patterson. “Through a collaborative process that generated input ideas from within and outside our college, we have developed a plan that builds on our strengths as an innovative learning community with a strong history of effectively anticipating emerging trends and opportunities in education, industry and business.

“Teaching and learning remain at the heart of who we are and everything that we do. Our collective commitment to the success of our students is woven throughout our strategic plan.”

The plan, which is available online at www.niagaracollege.ca/strategicplan includes three key strategic directions, built on an institutional foundation of collaboration and resourcefulness that values innovation and entrepreneurship in the College’s programs, services and operations. The strategic directions include:

  • A more culturally and globally engaged college, focused on inclusivity and engagement, more diverse in enrolment, with a broad range of programs that infuse new skills and competencies that align with the changing needs and expectations of learners and employers;
  • A significant enhancement of Niagara College’s model of experiential learning, leveraging the College’s unique location and expanding learning enterprises and other opportunities for work integrated learning; and
  • Leveraging the college’s culture of creative, innovative and entrepreneurial thinking to meet the evolving needs of students and employers alike; fostering the development of intangible skills in students while developing innovative programs to meet the needs of emerging and existing industry sectors.

“At a time when economic growth is so closely tied to highly skilled and adaptable workforces, Niagara College has developed a forward-looking strategic vision and commitment to excellence that will serve to further differentiate it from its peers across the postsecondary education sector and beyond,” said Carolyne Watts, chair of Niagara College’s Board of Governors.

Currently celebrating its 50th year as a College of Applied Arts and Technology, Niagara College is a leader in applied education and a key contributor to the economies of Niagara and Ontario. A regional college with a global reach, Niagara College offers more than 100 diploma, bachelor degree and advanced level programs. Learn more at www.niagaracollege.ca

-30-

Media inquiries, contact:

Susan McConnell
Media Advisor, Niagara College
905 641-2252 ext. 4330

Share this:

Take-home test could save your life

The message from Brenda Luscombe, Director of Niagara Health’s Colorectal Screening Program, is simple: Get checked.

“Getting checked for colon cancer helps find cancer earlier, when it may be easier to treat,” says Ms. Luscombe.

March is Colon Cancer Awareness Month. And Niagara Health, in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario, is encouraging you to get checked with a take-home test.

Colon cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in Ontario and the second most common cause of cancer deaths. It is estimated that in 2016, 9,900 Ontarians were diagnosed with colon cancer and about 3,200 Ontarians died from the disease.

However, when caught early, nine out of 10 people can be cured.

“It’s recommended that men and women at average risk between the ages of 50 and 74 get checked with a fecal occult blood test every two years,” says Ms. Luscombe, who is also Director of Clinical Services, Oncology and Ambulatory Services at Niagara Health. “This test is safe and painless and can be done at home. Many people don’t realize that colon cancer can be there for a long time before you show any symptoms, which makes it important to not only get checked, but also repeat the take-home test every two years even if you feel fine.”

How to check for colon cancer  

You can check for colon cancer with a fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The FOBT is a safe and painless cancer screening test that checks a person’s stool for tiny drops of blood, which could be caused by colon cancer. Take-home FOBT kits are available from healthcare providers. People without a family doctor or nurse practitioner can get a kit through Telehealth Ontario at 1-866-828-9213, community pharmacies and mobile screening coaches. Once the samples are collected, they can be sent to a lab for testing using the postage-paid envelope provided in the kit or by returning the kit to a specimen collection centre.

 Who should be checked for colon cancer? 

People between 50 and 74 years of age without a parent, brother, sister or child who has been diagnosed with colon cancer are considered to be average risk for the disease and should get checked every two years with the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). People with a family history of colon cancer in a parent, brother, sister or child are at an increased risk for developing the disease. These individuals should be checked with a colonoscopy (instead of an FOBT) beginning at age 50, or 10 years earlier than the age their relative was diagnosed, whichever comes first.  Some people who have had polyps removed from their colon, as well as people with inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), may be at increased risk for developing colon cancer and may need to be checked regularly with colonoscopy.

Benefits of getting checked for colon cancer 

Screening helps find colon cancer early, when there are no uncomfortable symptoms such as persistent diarrhea and stomach pain, and when treatment has the best chance of working. When colon cancer is caught early, nine out of 10 people with the disease can be cured. If colon cancer is caught after it has already spread to other parts of the body, treating it is harder and less likely to be successful. For people whose colon cancer has spread, as few as one out of eight will be cured.

For more information about colon cancer screening in Ontario, visit www.cancercare.on.ca/colon.

MEDIA CONTACT INFORMATION
Steven Gallagher, Communications Specialist
905-378-4647, ext. 43879 I 289-696-6767 (Cell)
steven.gallagher@niagarahealth.on.ca

Share this:

Niagara Falls approves inter-municipal transit

Niagara Falls city council voted unanimously to get on board with inter-municipal transit, following similar votes in St. Catharines and Welland in recent weeks.

The vote Tuesday evening endorsed in principle the creation of a consolidated system — a partnership between Niagara Falls, St. Catharines, Welland and Niagara Region.

The issue will now go before the Region.

Niagara Falls Mayor Jim Diodati, a member of Niagara’s inter-municipal transit working group that includes the mayors and chief administrative officers of the three cities, said there is no reason it should “take hours” to get from community to community, adding it’s encouraging to see transit providers in the three urban centres coming together.

Mishka Balsom, chief executive officer, and Hugo Chesshire, policy and government relations manager, of the Greater Niagara Chamber of Commerce addressed council and brought support from the business community.

Balsom said the business community supports a more robust transportation network because they believe it will make Niagara a more attractive region.

“Moving people around more efficiently (creates) a larger labour pool,” she said.

Several other groups support inter-municipal transit, including Brock University and Niagara College students, who believe it will help them more easily get around.

Council’s vote requested Niagara Region support a consolidated transit model and become formally involved in providing public transit through a triple majority process.

That process involves all 12 municipalities in Niagara voting on the issue and the majority of councils representing the majority of the population would have to support it.

Council directed its staff to develop a memorandum of understanding between the four parties to come up with a governance framework and specify how key issues are to be addressed with next steps and timelines.

Council also supported the formation of a transit working group with representatives from all 12 municipalities and the Region. The current inter-municipal working group would transition to a transit steering committee until a new governance framework is established in the pending memorandum of understanding.

The committee would also come up with the costs of the plan and potentially different models.

Coun. Wayne Thomson said inter-municipal transit is a “no brainer.”

“This is so important for this municipality,” he said.

Coun. Joyce Morocco said Niagara Falls needs to “jump on this bandwagon,” as it will go a long way to getting residents to school, employment and appointments across the region.

Coun. Kim Craitor said he had the opportunity to attend the St. Catharines council meeting where politicians in the Garden City unanimously endorsed inter-municipal transit in principle.

Craitor said he has spoken to some colleagues in Welland and other Niagara communities who are also excited about the issue.

“It’s nice to see all three major municipalities working together on this,” he said, adding it could be a “catalyst” for pulling regional communities together as one unified voice in the future.

rspiteri@postmedia.com


Original article: http://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/2017/02/28/niagara-falls-approves-inter-municipal-transit

Share this:

Chamber This Week – February 28, 2017














Chamber This Week – February 28, 2017


Share this:

Cuvée: Eat, drink and support students and research

It’s that time again, when people mark their calendars for one of Ontario’s favourite and most delicious fundraisers.

The annual Cuvée Grand Tasting takes place on Friday, March 24 at the Scotiabank Convention Centre in Niagara Falls, where last year nearly 800 people attended a sold-out party characterized by top vintages, gourmet food and live music.

Organized by Brock University’s Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute (CCOVI), the popular event exposes participants to Ontario’s best wines while raising thousands of dollars to fund academic scholarships and research.

“Not only does Cuvée showcase VQA wines to consumers,” says CCOVI Director Debbie Inglis, “it helps Ontario students and our grape and wine industry by supporting important research and scholarships.”

Cuvée begins with the Friday evening Grand Tasting, when 48 VQA wineries uncork some of their best wines and guests get to sample the winemakers’ personal favourites. A change to this year’s event will see each winery offer not one but two of their winemakers’selections.

To complement the wine, 12 culinary partners from the Niagara region will be presenting signature dishes at live cooking stations.

“As much as the oenophiles enjoy the event, the foodies do, too,” said Cuvée manager Barb Tatarnic.

This year’s chefs include:

  • Artisan Ontario – Pingue and Hand, chefs J. Mark Hand and Jim Duncan
  • Benchmark Restaurant and the Canadian Food and Wine Institute, chef Manager Alex White
  • Bolete Restaurant, chef Andrew McLeod
  • Centreplate, chef James Price
  • Fallsview Casino Resort, executive chef Raymond Taylor
  • Kitchen 76 at Two Sisters Winery, chef Justin Lesso
  • OLiV Restaurant at Strewn Winery, chef Robert Webster
  • Tide and Vine Oyster House, chef Justin Duc
  • Trius Winery Restaurant, executive chef Frank Dodd
  • Criveller Cakes, chefs Giovanni Del Priore and Leonardo Priore
  • Italian Ice Cream, chef Andrew Vergalito

The tribute continues through the March 25-26 weekend with the Cuvée en Route program. Participants get an electronic passport that lets them visit up to 38 wineries across the region, to sample exclusive flights from each of the wineries’ collections.

Tickets that include both the Friday night Grand Tasting and the weekend-long en Route passport are available online at cuvee.ca for $200 per person. Tickets for the en Route passport only are $30.

Note: Media interested in covering Cuvée must request credentials in advance. Contact Dan Dakin at ddakin@brocku.ca

For more information:

Dan Dakin, Media Relations Officer, Brock University ddakin@brocku.ca, 905-688-5550 x5353 or 905-347-1970

 – 30 –

Share this: